It was held that a person cannot have two domiciles and there is a presumption in the continuation of the existing domicile. The burden of proof lies on the party alleging that the domicile has changed. It was also held that a letter which was given by the Deputy Commissioner of India to the applicant does not supersede Rule 31 of the ‘Permit System Rules 1949.
Habib Ahmed Rizvi vs The Crown
Relevant Legislation (Internal Link)