Supporting Link(s)
Habib Ahmed Rizvi v The Crown [AIR 1950 Nag 161]
Relevant Legislation (Internal Link)
The Influx from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1948 No. XXXIV of 1948
Summary/Remarks
It was held that a person cannot have two domiciles and there is a presumption in the continuation of the existing domicile. The burden of proof lies on the party alleging that the domicile has changed. It was also held that a letter which was given by the Deputy Commissioner of India to the applicant does not supersede Rule 31 of the ‘Permit System Rules 1949.